These are the old FoMoCo Obsolete Forums and are being hosted by JCOConsulting.com. While you're here, check out my articles or have a look around at some of the Ford Stuff we have for sale. You might find something you can't live without.

Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2591&Reply=2591><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>390GT ? - looking at buying '68GT390 FB</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Mike, <i>08/28/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>Hi all,<br><br>I am looking into purchasing a '68GT390 FB - lime gold - black interior, fold down - AC ( missing the guts) etc...for a decent price (I think) $8-8.5K - car is in excellent shape - one minor rust bubble - everything else excellent. Car is missing the turn signal hood and fog lites in the grill - will have to get that back correct.<br><br>I have a few questions - I should know this one - but did the GT's in '68 have dual swaybars? Or just the front. My '68GT coupe I sold had both - but I think somone added the one in the rear.<br><br>The orig. 390Gt motor was tossed in favor of rebuilding a '69 390 motor - the motor is setup with some parts I am not sure if they make sense.<br><br>390 block<br>427 low riser intake<br>428 rods<br>390 crank<br>427 pushrods and adjustable rockers<br><br>do these parts make sense - could they cause any problems in the future?<br><br>tia,<br>Mike<br><br><br> </blockquote> 390GT ? - looking at buying '68GT390 FB -- Mike, 08/28/2000
Hi all,

I am looking into purchasing a '68GT390 FB - lime gold - black interior, fold down - AC ( missing the guts) etc...for a decent price (I think) $8-8.5K - car is in excellent shape - one minor rust bubble - everything else excellent. Car is missing the turn signal hood and fog lites in the grill - will have to get that back correct.

I have a few questions - I should know this one - but did the GT's in '68 have dual swaybars? Or just the front. My '68GT coupe I sold had both - but I think somone added the one in the rear.

The orig. 390Gt motor was tossed in favor of rebuilding a '69 390 motor - the motor is setup with some parts I am not sure if they make sense.

390 block
427 low riser intake
428 rods
390 crank
427 pushrods and adjustable rockers

do these parts make sense - could they cause any problems in the future?

tia,
Mike


Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2598&Reply=2591><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: 390GT ? - looking at buying '68GT390 FB</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>John.J, <i>08/29/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>What type of heads are they?.The intake should be o.k depending on the type of heads.The 390GT intake is also a decent intake(not as good as a CJ intake).The adjustable rockers are a nice bonustoo.Don't be fooled into thinking the rods are CJ rods because they have the C7AE-B casting in them(standard C7AE-B rods have 3/8 rod bolts,the CJ rods have 11/32 bolts).the rod and crank are or should be good as is.Hope this helps...John </blockquote> RE: 390GT ? - looking at buying '68GT390 FB -- John.J, 08/29/2000
What type of heads are they?.The intake should be o.k depending on the type of heads.The 390GT intake is also a decent intake(not as good as a CJ intake).The adjustable rockers are a nice bonustoo.Don't be fooled into thinking the rods are CJ rods because they have the C7AE-B casting in them(standard C7AE-B rods have 3/8 rod bolts,the CJ rods have 11/32 bolts).the rod and crank are or should be good as is.Hope this helps...John
 RE: 390GT ? - looking at buying '68GT390 FB -- Mike, 08/30/2000
Hey John,
I think they were regular 428 heads.
Sad to say it doesn't really matter now - my parents want me to give Stangs a rest for a few months and concentrate on work and start looking for another around Feb./March. I know it will be hard to find another '68GT FB in this condition for the price - $8K - but maybe it will still be there in the winter - or I'll have time to find a 4spd!

thanks
Mike
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2590&Reply=2590><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>1965 390 Overheating problem</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Jim, <i>08/28/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>I have an odd problem. I purchased a 1965 Ford Galaxie with a 390 4V a couple of years ago, and it has always had a significant overheating problem when it idles for more than 15 minutes. Temp would excede 220 degrees if I didnt stop the car and allow it to cool off. <br><br>Ive had the radiator rodded and cored, and replaced the entire cooling system. (no leaks, etc.) Ive also completely overhauled the engine (.030 overbore), and added a fan shroud, larger fan, and electric "puller" style fan. The car is tuned properly, runs well, and has over 150 pounds of compression on each cylander. Im honestly at a loss to explain this problem, which makes the car undrivable in afternoon traffic. <br><br>Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!<br> </blockquote> 1965 390 Overheating problem -- Jim, 08/28/2000
I have an odd problem. I purchased a 1965 Ford Galaxie with a 390 4V a couple of years ago, and it has always had a significant overheating problem when it idles for more than 15 minutes. Temp would excede 220 degrees if I didnt stop the car and allow it to cool off.

Ive had the radiator rodded and cored, and replaced the entire cooling system. (no leaks, etc.) Ive also completely overhauled the engine (.030 overbore), and added a fan shroud, larger fan, and electric "puller" style fan. The car is tuned properly, runs well, and has over 150 pounds of compression on each cylander. Im honestly at a loss to explain this problem, which makes the car undrivable in afternoon traffic.

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!
 RE: 1965 390 Overheating problem -- kevin, 09/08/2000
Hi,

I've got a 427 and building a 410 too. Mine runs hot too in traffic. But, one thing you should know is try the 428cj waterpump with larger impeller. C9AE-B? I believe. Or just buy an Edelbrock alum. waterpump. Havent tried it yet. I also run a 160degree thermostat. Ive heard if you drill a small bypass hole in the thermostat it helps alot, although this wasnt on a FE, not sure if theres room on FE thermostat. I also had my 2 core radiator recored to a 4 core. Superior radiator in mount clemens,mi. Most rad shops say they can only add one extra core, but this place can do it.
good luck./
kevin
 RE: 1965 390 Overheating problem -- KarlJay, 09/10/2000
You may want to try Water Wetter or ProBlends line of products I've heard great things about them.
The timming can effect the operating temp as well. The Ed Alum pump is a good investment at about $150 and should help. Don't forget that water / antifreeze ratio should be about 70% water. Water cools much better that antifreeze and don't forget about bleading air out of the system. If the engine sits above the rad or if you have a side-to-side flow type, you should have one of those expansion tanks to allow the air to rise.
Milodon makes a 160 deg high flow for about $10
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2584&Reply=2584><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>BOSS 302 Crankshaft</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Andy, <i>08/27/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>A thrust bearing in my 1970 BOSS 302 had ground a groove into my crankshaft. I dropped it off at the machine shop and they repaired it, "good as new". All the clearances were checked and re-checked and we dropped the crank back in. When we rotated the crank it felt real tight. It turns smoothly, just seems too tight. If anybody can let me know if this is normal for this motor, I'd really appreciate it.<br><br>-AF<br> </blockquote> BOSS 302 Crankshaft -- Andy, 08/27/2000
A thrust bearing in my 1970 BOSS 302 had ground a groove into my crankshaft. I dropped it off at the machine shop and they repaired it, "good as new". All the clearances were checked and re-checked and we dropped the crank back in. When we rotated the crank it felt real tight. It turns smoothly, just seems too tight. If anybody can let me know if this is normal for this motor, I'd really appreciate it.

-AF
 RE: BOSS 302 Crankshaft -- Phill Oppelt, 08/28/2000
I believe there is a specification for this in
inch/lbs but am not sure what it is. it will feel
tight but smooth.
 RE: BOSS 302 Crankshaft-Thrust? -- Rob, 08/29/2000
What is your crank thrust as measured with a dial indicator or feeler guages? If the repaired thrust face on the crank is too thick, or built up now, your thrust will be too small and the crank will be tight. You can also check all bearing clearances, not just one or two. Found that a machine shop had installed a number 4 bearing cap from another block on a fellow's 428 once and it was tight as sin due to cap mismatch. So you must check everything.
 RE: BOSS 302 Crankshaft -- Paul, 08/29/2000
U can use plastigage, sold over any parts counter. It's do it your self & inexpencive.
 We Fixed It -- Andy, 08/30/2000
We've got it covered. The repaired portion of the crank had been too narrow (on the money Rob) and it's been taking care of. Thanks to all who responded.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2578&Reply=2578><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>Operating Temps</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Skid Marc, <i>08/27/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>I feel like my '67 390 is running hot. It runs from 180 to 190. What are the designed operating temps for the 390?  </blockquote> Operating Temps -- Skid Marc, 08/27/2000
I feel like my '67 390 is running hot. It runs from 180 to 190. What are the designed operating temps for the 390?
 RE: Operating Temps -- Dave Shoe, 09/03/2000
I mainly use pinging, visible steam, and the red idiot light guide me, but I suspect you're in good shape at those operating temperatures.

Sorry if I don't go into detail, but I really don't know what proper temp numbers are. I do believe that 180-190 is right where I'd like to see my numbers unless I was racing, at which time I'd expect it to go up 10 degrees at a minimum.

Yes, it's wise to wait for a real opinion, but I figure it wouldn't hurt to step in with mine about now.

Shoe.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2577&Reply=2577><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>I ran my new 390 with a valve cover off</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Bill Ballinger, <i>08/27/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>It's been smoking and using a quart every 75 miles. <br><br>And in less than a minute it had poured over a quart (nearly 2 I think)of oil over the edge of the valve cover rail.  This is with one valve cover off! I don't think I need that much oil up there do you?<br><br>The guides must be flooded with oil and are sucking it down, causing the smoke.  They are new knurled Ohio guides, and I have umbrellas instead of PCs.  The lifter galleys are blocked for a solid cam, and I have a #90 Holley jet under the stand.  Could the pressure be so high with those galleys blocked that it has increased the oil to the shafts? I'm thinking I need PC seals, at least on the intakes.  A friend mentioned a 231 Buick seal that might work, has anyone used them?<br><br>It sounds like I need a smaller restrictor too, how far down can I safely go?  What size Holley jet would get down to say .060-.080?      </blockquote> I ran my new 390 with a valve cover off -- Bill Ballinger, 08/27/2000
It's been smoking and using a quart every 75 miles.

And in less than a minute it had poured over a quart (nearly 2 I think)of oil over the edge of the valve cover rail. This is with one valve cover off! I don't think I need that much oil up there do you?

The guides must be flooded with oil and are sucking it down, causing the smoke. They are new knurled Ohio guides, and I have umbrellas instead of PCs. The lifter galleys are blocked for a solid cam, and I have a #90 Holley jet under the stand. Could the pressure be so high with those galleys blocked that it has increased the oil to the shafts? I'm thinking I need PC seals, at least on the intakes. A friend mentioned a 231 Buick seal that might work, has anyone used them?

It sounds like I need a smaller restrictor too, how far down can I safely go? What size Holley jet would get down to say .060-.080?
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2579&Reply=2577><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: I ran my new 390 with a valve cover off</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>truck, <i>08/27/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>My brother had similar problems on a new 390 a while back and he had restrictors ( cutoff chevy pushrod.) He endedup with pc seals but I don't recall numbers.  He was using a high volume pump and I think this is more of a problem than and aid as I sure don't see many 390's with bearing problems with a stock oil pump.  Pumping  all that oil takes power and builds heat in the oil too. </blockquote> RE: I ran my new 390 with a valve cover off -- truck, 08/27/2000
My brother had similar problems on a new 390 a while back and he had restrictors ( cutoff chevy pushrod.) He endedup with pc seals but I don't recall numbers. He was using a high volume pump and I think this is more of a problem than and aid as I sure don't see many 390's with bearing problems with a stock oil pump. Pumping all that oil takes power and builds heat in the oil too.
 RE: I ran my new 390 with a valve cover off -- Bill Ballinger, 08/27/2000
That's what's weird, I have an M57 Mellings standard pump, not an HV. The oil just poured over the side of the cover rail, so that in less than a minute I had a mess. It wasn't splashing around at all, just building up on the bottom side and spilling over.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2583&Reply=2577><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: I ran my new 390 with a valve cover off</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>JasonK, <i>08/27/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>Bill, I'm running #80 jets in the oil passage to the rocker arms. No trouble yet. Of course, my oil pressure is really low, anyway.<br>JasonK </blockquote> RE: I ran my new 390 with a valve cover off -- JasonK, 08/27/2000
Bill, I'm running #80 jets in the oil passage to the rocker arms. No trouble yet. Of course, my oil pressure is really low, anyway.
JasonK
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2586&Reply=2577><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: I ran my new 390 with a valve cover off</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Bill Youngs, <i>08/27/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>Are you sure you have the rocker shafts right side up. If oil pressure is eractic this could very well be the problem. Might be something to check. Bill </blockquote> RE: I ran my new 390 with a valve cover off -- Bill Youngs, 08/27/2000
Are you sure you have the rocker shafts right side up. If oil pressure is eractic this could very well be the problem. Might be something to check. Bill
 RE: I ran my new 390 with a valve cover off -- Bill Ballinger, 08/27/2000
First thing I checked :-) The holes are down.
 RE: I ran my new 390 with a valve cover off -- RC Moser, 08/27/2000
Bill, I first have to ask if your Valve covers were vented with the PCV valve? Did you put a direct pressure gauge on it? If so what was the pressure? Do you have the standard rocker/lifters and were they known good before the rebuild? To me running the engine with the valve covers off with no little clips to slow down the oil flow will make guite a mess. A guart in a minute or two would be normal to me with both covers off. You say is smokes and burns a quart every 75 miles. Does is smoke on acceleration or deacceleration? Smoke bad when you first start it? With this kind of oil burning you should be able to see it on the plugs? I'd do a compression check to see if the bottom end is good. Is the oil on all the plugs or just a few? I'll take a guess if it's got good compression say around 150 across all cylinders and say it probably the valve guides and seals if all the plugs are oil fouled. Guides are hard to get knurd right. Hope this gives you some more Ideas? RC
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2569&Reply=2569><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b> I was informed there are three different 428CJ</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff> Robert, <i>08/27/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>EXHAUST MANIFOLDS. Whil similar there are supposed to be additional ribs that reduce the dhance of cracking .....Is this real? </blockquote>  I was informed there are three different 428CJ -- Robert, 08/27/2000
EXHAUST MANIFOLDS. Whil similar there are supposed to be additional ribs that reduce the dhance of cracking .....Is this real?
 Different, sure. Tougher?....don't see how [n/m] -- Mr F, 08/27/2000
n/m
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2550&Reply=2550><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>Headers</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>mike, <i>08/25/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>Could anyone tell me where i can pick up a set of headers for a 428cj. Thanks </blockquote> Headers -- mike, 08/25/2000
Could anyone tell me where i can pick up a set of headers for a 428cj. Thanks
 RE: Headers -- gerry, 08/25/2000
What problems are you having, Mike? Is the engine installed in a Studebaker pickup or something? If engine is installed in an original configuration, then you can get Summit or Jeg's to special order them for you. Just because you don't see the product in the catalog doesn't mean they don't exist or they can't get them. Just start your order with..."I need to make a special order."
 RE: Headers -- mike, 08/26/2000
I tried them they do not carry them or can they get them.
 RE: Headers -- Ken, 08/26/2000
Mike,
Try FPA www.fordpowertrain.com/ They carry all the correct header flanges for both high and low exit exhaust ports and should have what you need.

Good luck
Ken
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2566&Reply=2550><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: Headers</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Rodney, <i>08/26/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>You can get ahold of Lightening Bolt headers, from Krites Restoration, in Ohio.  Phone # 740-983-6428. </blockquote> RE: Headers -- Rodney, 08/26/2000
You can get ahold of Lightening Bolt headers, from Krites Restoration, in Ohio. Phone # 740-983-6428.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2570&Reply=2550><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: Headers  wake up and smell the roses!</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff> Robert, <i>08/27/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>         There are not that many makers of FE headers and you darn well look into the configuration and complexity (people been known to kill things following a MUSTANG 390/428 header install.) Headers are a major power maker and sizes are critical with cam selection.<br>          If anyone finds a SS header manufacturer for FE/MUSTANGs please let me know! </blockquote> RE: Headers wake up and smell the roses! -- Robert, 08/27/2000
There are not that many makers of FE headers and you darn well look into the configuration and complexity (people been known to kill things following a MUSTANG 390/428 header install.) Headers are a major power maker and sizes are critical with cam selection.
If anyone finds a SS header manufacturer for FE/MUSTANGs please let me know!
 RE: Headers wake up and smell the roses! -- mike, 08/27/2000
Thanks for the info guys im sure it will help.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2547&Reply=2547><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>Timing?</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Chris, <i>08/25/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>Need help with timing a 70 LTD w/390 2v. The car seems to be lacking in power. Complete rebuild this month. The mechanical advance runs 40 degrees w/o vacuum to the dist. With vacuum to the dist yeilds 76 degrees total timing. I have both styles of vacuum advance(single and dual diaphram). The advertised torque of 390ft/lbs wont even spin a tire! Losing faith fast. Suggestions are welcome. Thank you. </blockquote> Timing? -- Chris, 08/25/2000
Need help with timing a 70 LTD w/390 2v. The car seems to be lacking in power. Complete rebuild this month. The mechanical advance runs 40 degrees w/o vacuum to the dist. With vacuum to the dist yeilds 76 degrees total timing. I have both styles of vacuum advance(single and dual diaphram). The advertised torque of 390ft/lbs wont even spin a tire! Losing faith fast. Suggestions are welcome. Thank you.
 RE: Timing? -- RC Moser, 08/26/2000
Cris, I'd first do a compression check see it any valves are leaking. You have to have enough cylinder pressure (usually 150 PSI or more on a new engine depending on the altitude) to have Torque or HP. Their are several different lengths of pushrods available to adjust valve lash hence their is no adjustment on the FE style rockers. You might have too long a pushrods causing the valves to bleed of the cylinder pressure causing lack of power due to lack of compression? Does the engine backfire? how much vacuum is it pulling (should be at least 17" 19" or 20" at 750 RPM is norm)? With NO 1 TDC on the compression stroke where is you rotor button pointing (should be just before the NO. 1 port on the cap due to you initial timing set around 8 to 10 degree? What is your initial timing set on (Should be around 8 degree)? maybe this will help some. RC
 RE: Timing? -- robert, 08/26/2000
some thoughts on your timing.hope this may help.1. its is very commen for the timing ring to slip on the crank pully, i was made aware of this in a article by ponycar carbs in cazenovia ny. Apperently when you go to time the car with the timing light your lining the timing mark up to the factory specs, but the ring has slipped on the pully reletive to top dead center on the crank .So in essence you are not timing any thing at all. Ponycars solution is basicly to advance the timing to the point the car stumbles at idle then back it off a few degrees. I assume the you would do this with the vacuam advance dissconnected. At this point you will have acheived about as much advance as the engine will tolerate. you can then test drive the car with the vacuam advance still diconnected and see it it pings. if it pings back off the timing in 2 degree increments till the pinging stops. assuming this all works this would be your new intial timing setting. Now if you have a adjustable vacuam advance unit you should connect the hose and road test the car in high gear under load. using your allen key inside the hose fiting on the advance unit adjust the vacuam advance for the most advance with out pinging. reset your base idle on the carb and your done. NOTE if you disconect the coil and pull the #1 spark plug you can put a pen or pencil in the spark plug hole and have some one turn the engine over by hand with a socket and breaker bar untill your feel the piston hit top dead center. at this point the 0 degree mark on the balancer should line up with your timing pointer.[ if the piston is on the top of the exhaust stroke you may have to give the crank another turn to get to top dead center on the intake stroke, I"ll be damned if i can remember if it lines up every revolution or every other one] this should give you indication if the balancer has rotated relative to the crank. With #1 piston at top dead center is the distributer rotor pointing to the #1 spark plug lead on the cap? it should be....if not. the distributer is probably off by a tooth 3.I questin your timing figures of 40 degrees and 76 degrees total advance. you figure out your timeing by taking your intial advance i.e the 10 degree factory setting and mutiplying by 2 then adding the amount of advance in the distributer.{typicly about 12 degrees} or in other words 10/2+12=32 degrees total advance. Ford often stamped the amount of distributer advance on the breaker plate if you pull the cap you may see a 11 or 13 stamped inside. There is also a chance that somehow the cam sprocket was installed a tooth off.if your rebuild included new rings it may take about 600 mi to break the motor in. you will also need to reset the timing, idle mixture and curb idle once the motor has settled in. Unfortunatly is sounds that it is very likely that the cam timing gear may be off by a tooth. But i would definatly make sure tha it is not a ignition or carb problem first. Also have you checked the intake and carb base for vacuam leaks? Last but not least is the simply let the motor run at the advance curve it runs best on Reguardless of what the Factory Specifations say. Some of this may seem real basic but i dont have any idea as to what type of automobile knowlage you posess. 70 Ltds are cool! 390 2V is an excellent all around engine and if you didnt tell any body riding in the car they would assume that it had a 4V from the way they run. let me Know how it works out and good luck. gotta go my 1967 colony park wagon has a 390 2V but by any luck buy tommorow it will be a 390 with a 1967 s code 4V manifold, a 1966 police inercepter autolite carb. a 428 cobrajet cam with a 427 HV oil pump and a 427 lowriser oilpan. hey what can i say its gotta trailer hitch. Airstream eliminator Anyone?
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2565&Reply=2547><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: Timing?</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Ken, <i>08/26/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>Chris,<br>I somewhat agree with Robert. I don't think your engine would even start with 76 degrees of timing. Most FE's in general like 36 to 38 degrees of total timing. Make sure your damper hasn't spun & giving you false timing. However, you want to multiply what's in your distributor x 2 and add your initial timing to it to arrive at your total timing, which would now be 34 instead of 32 degrees as in Robert's example. I run a Vertex Magneto and this is how the theory is applied, I don't believe it's any different for a distributor.  Also, your rotor should be pointing at the #1 cylinder if the distributors in right. But if someone installed it a tooth off and the rotor now points at #2 cylinder, someone could have simply started the firing order on that cylinder by designating the #2 as #1 cylinder, just something to be aware of. If this is a performance engine I'd do away with the vacuum advance, it's basically for gas mileage. If it's a daily commuter the it's a good idea. As for your adjustments once you're dialed in, Robert hit the nail on the head as he did on what to troubleshoot for.<br><br>Good luck<br>Ken<br> </blockquote> RE: Timing? -- Ken, 08/26/2000
Chris,
I somewhat agree with Robert. I don't think your engine would even start with 76 degrees of timing. Most FE's in general like 36 to 38 degrees of total timing. Make sure your damper hasn't spun & giving you false timing. However, you want to multiply what's in your distributor x 2 and add your initial timing to it to arrive at your total timing, which would now be 34 instead of 32 degrees as in Robert's example. I run a Vertex Magneto and this is how the theory is applied, I don't believe it's any different for a distributor. Also, your rotor should be pointing at the #1 cylinder if the distributors in right. But if someone installed it a tooth off and the rotor now points at #2 cylinder, someone could have simply started the firing order on that cylinder by designating the #2 as #1 cylinder, just something to be aware of. If this is a performance engine I'd do away with the vacuum advance, it's basically for gas mileage. If it's a daily commuter the it's a good idea. As for your adjustments once you're dialed in, Robert hit the nail on the head as he did on what to troubleshoot for.

Good luck
Ken
 RE: Timing? -- robert, 08/27/2000
kens right about the correct way of figuring advance, realized after i sent the reply. thanks ken
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2546&Reply=2546><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>Autolite 4100 Carbs - Make offer</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>kevin casto, <i>08/25/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>Hi FE people.....I have these carbs<br>that someone out there needs....<br>Take a look at the pictures here:<br><a href="http://casto.homepage.com/carbs.html">http://casto.homepage.com/carbs.html</a><br>Best offer,  Thanks,  Kevin </blockquote> Autolite 4100 Carbs - Make offer -- kevin casto, 08/25/2000
Hi FE people.....I have these carbs
that someone out there needs....
Take a look at the pictures here:
http://casto.homepage.com/carbs.html
Best offer, Thanks, Kevin
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2554&Reply=2546><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>How bad do you need to sell them?</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>ED Jenkins, <i>08/26/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>I would offer you $40 for everything, I dont know if you would let them go for that cheap(I was wanting to experement with different size booster Venturis in my current carb(4100) I am looking for the smaller and larger size 4100's you have a 1.08 that I would like to buy.). Even if you don't want to sell them that cheap, it was worth a try anyway.  </blockquote> How bad do you need to sell them? -- ED Jenkins, 08/26/2000
I would offer you $40 for everything, I dont know if you would let them go for that cheap(I was wanting to experement with different size booster Venturis in my current carb(4100) I am looking for the smaller and larger size 4100's you have a 1.08 that I would like to buy.). Even if you don't want to sell them that cheap, it was worth a try anyway.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2568&Reply=2546><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: How bad do you need to sell them?</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Kevin Casto, <i>08/26/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>Hi Steve/Ed<br><br>Well, I don't really need them for any<br>cars I'm working on now.  Thanks for making<br>an offer anyway.  Price reduction is to<br>junk-yard pricing !!!!    I would take<br>$80 for all 4  ($20 ea) so with shipping....<br>would be around $96 i guess. <br>None of these carbs are frozen....all butterflies<br>operate smoothly.<br>The carbs can be seen here....<br><a href="http://casto.homepage.com/carbs.html">http://casto.homepage.com/carbs.html</a><br><br> </blockquote> RE: How bad do you need to sell them? -- Kevin Casto, 08/26/2000
Hi Steve/Ed

Well, I don't really need them for any
cars I'm working on now. Thanks for making
an offer anyway. Price reduction is to
junk-yard pricing !!!! I would take
$80 for all 4 ($20 ea) so with shipping....
would be around $96 i guess.
None of these carbs are frozen....all butterflies
operate smoothly.
The carbs can be seen here....
http://casto.homepage.com/carbs.html

Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2571&Reply=2546><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>Are you interested in a 4100 modification article?</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Ed Jenkins, <i>08/27/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>I have one copied to disc that I can send to you via e-mail if you want? It is from a Street machine magazine from the 60's. </blockquote> Are you interested in a 4100 modification article? -- Ed Jenkins, 08/27/2000
I have one copied to disc that I can send to you via e-mail if you want? It is from a Street machine magazine from the 60's.
 RE: Are you interested in a 4100 modification article? -- Kevin Casto, 08/27/2000
I used to own a 65 T-Bird which is why I had the carbs. Now I only fool with the 70/71 Torino and
Cyclone stuff. They use a much newer carb.
I'm only 38 and the only cars that interest me
from the 60's are 66/67 Ranchero, 65 Galaxie,
and 69 Mustang, 67/8/9 Cougar.

Thanks for offering the article but I'll pass.
Just trying to focus on my 70/71 Torinos right
now. I have a bunch of 60's and 70's magazines
that I'll probably sell on ebay when I get the
time.
Kev
ps-
Here is your previous msg.

Would you sell them for cheaper then $140 possibly, like $130 if so e-mail
me back
Thank's
ED Jenkins
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2575&Reply=2546><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: Are you interested in a 4100 modification article?</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>JasonK, <i>08/27/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>Ed, what kind of modifications are covered in this article? I may be interested in a copy. Thanks, Jason </blockquote> RE: Are you interested in a 4100 modification article? -- JasonK, 08/27/2000
Ed, what kind of modifications are covered in this article? I may be interested in a copy. Thanks, Jason
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2576&Reply=2546><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: Are you interested in a 4100 modification article?</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Ed Jenkins, <i>08/27/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>Well, the use of Carter AFB needles and seats, Holley secondary diaphram springs and Holley power valves.   </blockquote> RE: Are you interested in a 4100 modification article? -- Ed Jenkins, 08/27/2000
Well, the use of Carter AFB needles and seats, Holley secondary diaphram springs and Holley power valves.
 RE: Are you interested in a 4100 modification article? -- JasonK, 08/27/2000
I would definately be interested in a copy, if you'd be so kind. Thanks, Jason
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2544&Reply=2544><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>demon carbs</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Pete van der Heiden, <i>08/25/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>Anyone have experience with Demon carbs on your FE's. Edelbrocks and Holley's just don't cut it at 7200 ft above sea level. </blockquote> demon carbs -- Pete van der Heiden, 08/25/2000
Anyone have experience with Demon carbs on your FE's. Edelbrocks and Holley's just don't cut it at 7200 ft above sea level.
Collapse <a href=../ForumFE/reply.aspx?ID=2548&Reply=2544><img src=../images/reply.png width=30 height=10></a>&nbsp;<b>RE: demon carbs</b>&nbsp;-- <font color=#0000ff>Louie, <i>08/25/2000</i></font><br /><blockquote>I grew up in Colorado and I know your pain.  Have you considered a Predator carb or Holley fuel injection?<br><br>BTW, the Alps or the Rockies??? </blockquote> RE: demon carbs -- Louie, 08/25/2000
I grew up in Colorado and I know your pain. Have you considered a Predator carb or Holley fuel injection?

BTW, the Alps or the Rockies???
 RE: demon carbs -- Pete van der Heiden, 08/25/2000
right above you in Laramie. no to both. thanks for the response
 RE: demon carbs -- Pat in Rescue, 08/27/2000
I have a 850 Speed Demon on a stroked 427 and while I suspect it is a little too big, I haven't had any trouble. I have driven the car over the Sierra's (7200ft) without any problem. I would think that a carb is a carb though and don't see why a Holley couldn't be made to work OK.
Go to the top of this page
Go back one page Back    Next Go forward one page

461 462 463 464 465 466