|
|
Original Message
|
RE: '6A F' = 'C6AF-F' = 1966 390/428 C6 exc. T/E = 1.08" ven. [n/m] |
By blake fensler - 04/06/2004 6:14:55 PM; IP 148.167.148.100 |
Ok, that sounds great for me(the 1.08). Now why did ford put the 1.08 which is a 480cfm on the 390/428 w/a C6? Wouldn't the big block be gasping to have the 600 cfm carb instead of the smaller one? All of the big blocks i thought had the larger 1.12 ratio. What was up with that? Was this one of those "Fords better ideas for 1966"? Just curious... |
|
This thread, so far...
|
Skip Navigation Links.
| | ![Collapse <b>RE: '6A F' = 'C6AF-F' = 1966 390/428 C6 exc. T/E = 1.08" ven. [n/m]</b> -- <font color=#0000ff>blake fensler, <i>04/06/2004</i></font>](/WebResource.axd?d=5j1V7IJBhc-qdmzmrXlobhQ2z8cQxd4hlAYIUFPzCWN4hT7pbNrPMnLDjDfGJ05PzcvL8-SaOfnzmMu9sW3n2qt9hAU7FkhvGnHaBO1O-WDBrSsYH7gMA_YVhbAy3u6Z0&t=637814653746327080) | RE: '6A F' = 'C6AF-F' = 1966 390/428 C6 exc. T/E = 1.08" ven. [n/m] -- blake fensler, 04/06/2004 |
|
Post A Response
|
|
|
|