On the Thunderbird 390, why did Ford
switch from a cam with 270 degrees duration / .232" lift and a 600 CFM
carb to a cam with 256 degrees duration / .253" lift and a 446 CFM carb in
1966?
My understanding is that there was a
two-fold plan at work, here. Get ready for a long explanation:
As
Dave mentioned, this period saw important changes to federal
and state auto regulations. Among these were the mandating
of PCV valves in NY & elsewhere, replacing old-style
'road draft tube' ventilation. But the biggest problem for Ford
was CA's new, lower standards for hydrocarbon emissions.
Dearborn's 4v engines were already proving somewhat problematic in this
regard, so it was no surprise their workhorse 390 needed some tinkering to
pass.
And this was further complicated by another
change for '66: all grades of US pump gas had been reformulated. Premium
fuel, by now considered the de
facto touchstone of any 'personal luxury' car,
was bumped up from 99.0 octane to 99.8. Again, as with the
revised administrative laws, several Ford mills required
substantial rework to meet this challenge....or to take advantage of
it, as Ford's sales literature said at the
time.
So, the base 390 4v received a new carb,
heads, intake, cam and valve springs....not
to mention the in-line fuel filter & baffled oil
pan. All of this was designed around twin engineering ideals of (1) improving
warm-up & general driveability while (2) promoting lower emissions, both at
idle and at speed. This latter goal proved an elusive one,
revealing the stalwart Autolite 4100 as the weak link - hence 1967's
intro of the 4300 series and 'IMCO' engineering.
....but that's another story. Hope this helped. :-)
Mr
F